In 2018, 22 percent of out-of-state applicants were admitted by UCLA.
The acceptance rate for California residents: 12 percent.
Those numbers mean that of the 71,569 Californian applicants in 2018, only 8,725 were accepted.
That is not fair.
No matter the statistics of these out of state students, California public schools should have an obligation to admit residents first. Such a policy would not be an anomaly.
Many states, such as Texas, have a strict protocol in place to ensure the acceptance of their residents. According to Tex Admissions, 90 percent of admitted students must be residents. The remaining 10 percent of admitted students can be from other states or they are international.
Although these quotas are a little extreme, California could develop a similar approach that would limit each category of student. This would provide more opportunities for California residents to attend a UC school, however it would reduce profits for the UC system.
The UC system makes money off out of state students because tuition is much higher for out of state students than in-state ones.
To illustrate, during the 2018-2019 school year, tuition for California residents at UCLA was $13,225. For out of state students, it was $42,217 per year.Â
Coincidentally, many California students are not being offered a place at their public universities. Consequently, these seniors are being forced to decide among paying big bucks for a private school, attending lower tier CSUs, or enrolling in community college.
While many UC campuses offer TAG (Transfer Admission Guarantee) programs, it’s upsetting that qualified applicants have to wait another two years before they can enroll in a four-year university.
These developments cause some students to feel that the hours they spent studying for the SAT, completing personal insight questions, and filling out applications have gone to waste. Some may argue that the ELC, a system in place guarantee the top 9 percent of California seniors space at a UC campus, is suitable security for residents. However, this doesn’t guarantee a spot at a preferred UC campus.
As a member of the top 9 percent, I have been waitlisted to one UC campus and rejected from another, although my GPA and standardized test scores fell in the range for both campuses.
So yes, I will technically be offered admission to a UC campus for fall 2019, but I have little interest in attending UC Merced when I have many other solid offers already.
I have been fortunate with acceptances to CSUs, scholarships to many private schools, and having parents who saved for their child’s higher education. But there are still many people who were less fortunate because they were relying on the UC system.
California residents believed that their public universities, that they help fund, had an obligation to support them. Little did they know that these schools, especially the competitive ones, value students that pay higher tuition over residents.
The system is not fair but it also isn’t likely to change. So, I urge you to look beyond the UC system. Don’t place your future in the hands of a greedy organization.
Sheila Ramirez • Mar 28, 2019 at 11:59 pm
Outstanding article Lizzy. This is fantastic and you should be proud.
Well done
Lisa Trei • Mar 27, 2019 at 10:36 am
I completely agree with you, Lizzy. The system needs to serve residents that pay taxes for it. I’m glad to see you speaking up. Good luck with your future endeavors.